# Difference between revisions of "First derivative test"

(→Situations when the test is inconclusive) |
(→Notes) |
||

Line 107: | Line 107: | ||

* [[Higher derivative test]]s | * [[Higher derivative test]]s | ||

− | == | + | ==Strength of the test== |

===First derivative test does not require differentiability at the point=== | ===First derivative test does not require differentiability at the point=== | ||

Line 118: | Line 118: | ||

Assume that <math>f</math> is continuous at <math>c</math>, i.e., <math>\lim_{x \to c^-} f_1(x) = \lim_{x \to c^+} f_2(x) = v</math>. In that case, we can try to determine whether <math>c</math> is a point of local maximum, minimum, or neither by studying the sign of <math>f_1'</math> to the immediate left of <math>c</math> and the sign of <math>f_2'</math> to the immediate right of <math>c</math>. It is not necessary that <math>f</math> be differentiable at <math>c</math> (for more on how to differentiate piecewise functions, see [[differentiation rule for piecewise definition by interval]]). | Assume that <math>f</math> is continuous at <math>c</math>, i.e., <math>\lim_{x \to c^-} f_1(x) = \lim_{x \to c^+} f_2(x) = v</math>. In that case, we can try to determine whether <math>c</math> is a point of local maximum, minimum, or neither by studying the sign of <math>f_1'</math> to the immediate left of <math>c</math> and the sign of <math>f_2'</math> to the immediate right of <math>c</math>. It is not necessary that <math>f</math> be differentiable at <math>c</math> (for more on how to differentiate piecewise functions, see [[differentiation rule for piecewise definition by interval]]). | ||

+ | |||

+ | In particular, we ''may'' be able to apply the first derivative test in these two types of situations: | ||

+ | |||

+ | {| class="sortable" border="1" | ||

+ | ! Case !! Examples where the first derivative test works | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | <math>f</math> has one-sided derivatives at <math>c</math>, but these are not equal to each other || <math>f(x) := |x|</math> and <math>c = 0</math> (get local minimum) <br><math>f(x) := \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl} x, & x < 0 \\x^2, & x \ge 0 \\\end{array}\right.</math>, <math>c = 0</math> (get neither, as the function increases through the point) | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | <math>f</math> does not have well defined one-sided derivatives at <math>c</math>, but the derivative is defined on the immediate left and immediate right || <math>f(x) := x^{2/3}</math>, <math>c = 0</math> (get local minimum)<br><math>f(x) := x^{1/3}</math>, <math>c = 0</math> (get neither, as the function increases through the point) | ||

+ | |} | ||

+ | |||

+ | ===Relation between first derivative test and second derivative test=== | ||

+ | |||

+ | {{further|[[First derivative test is stronger than second derivative test]]}} | ||

+ | |||

+ | The first derivative test is ''strictly more powerful'' than the second derivative test. In other words, in any situation where the second derivative test is applicable and conclusive, the first derivative test is also applicable and conclusive. However, there are many situations where the first derivative test is conclusive but the second derivative test is not. | ||

+ | |||

+ | ===Relation between first derivative test and direct analysis of one-sided derivatives=== | ||

+ | |||

+ | The first derivative test is neither strictly stronger nor strictly weaker than a direct analysis of one-sided derivatives. By ''direct analysis of one-sided derivatives'' we mean using the sign of the left hand derivative and right hand derivative at the point to determine whether we have a strict local maximum or strict local minimum at the point. Note that the analysis of one-sided derivatives is inconclusive whenever the one-sided derivative is zero or undefined. We have: | ||

+ | |||

+ | {| class="sortable" border="1" | ||

+ | ! Example function !! Conclusion !! Is the first derivative test conclusive? !! Is direct analysis of one-sided derivatives conclusive? | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | | ||

+ | | <math>f(x) := x^2</math>, <math>c = 0</math> || local minimum || Yes || No, because both one-sided derivatives are zero | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | <math>f(x) := |x|</math>, <math>c = 0</math> || local minimum || Yes || Yes | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | <math>f(x) := \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl} |x|(2 + x \sin(1/x)) & x\ne 0 \\ 0, & x = 0 \\\end{array}\right.</math>, <math>c = 0</math> || local minimum || No || Yes | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | <math>f(x) := \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl} |x|(2 + \sin(1/x)) & x\ne 0 \\ 0, & x = 0 \\\end{array}\right.</math>, <math>c = 0</math> || local minimum || No || No | ||

+ | |} | ||

==When is the test conclusive and inconclusive?== | ==When is the test conclusive and inconclusive?== |

## Revision as of 15:19, 2 May 2012

## Contents

## Statement

### What the test is for

The **first derivative test** is a partial (i.e., not always conclusive) test used to determine whether a particular critical point in the domain of a function is a point where the function attains a local maximum value, local minimum value, or neither. There are cases where the test is *inconclusive*, which means that we cannot draw any conclusion.

### What the test says: one-sided sign versions

Suppose is a function defined at a point .

Then, we have the following:

Continuity and differentiability assumption | Hypothesis on sign of derivative | Conclusion |
---|---|---|

is left continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left of |
is positive (respectively, nonnegative) for to the immediate left of (i.e., for for sufficiently small ) | has a strict local maximum from the left at , i.e., (respectively, has a local maximum from the left at , i.e., ) for to the immediate left of . |

is left continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left of |
is negative (respectively, nonpositive) for to the immediate left of (i.e., for for sufficiently small ) | has a strict local minimum from the left at , i.e., (respectively, has a local minimum from the left at , i.e., ) for to the immediate left of . |

is right continuous at and differentiable on the immediate right of |
is positive (respectively, nonnegative) for to the immediate right of (i.e., for for sufficiently small ) | has a strict local minimum from the right at , i.e., (respectively, has a local minimum from the right at , i.e., ) for to the immediate right of . |

is right continuous at and differentiable on the immediate right of |
is negative (respectively, nonpositive) for to the immediate right of (i.e., for for sufficiently small ) | has a strict local maximum from the right at , i.e., (respectively, has a local maximum from the right at , i.e., ) for to the immediate right of . |

### What the test says: combined sign versions

Suppose is a function defined around a point (i.e., is defined in an open interval containing ) and is continuous at . We do not care whether is differentiable at ; however, the test makes sense only if is differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of .

Then, we have the following (we list only the *strict* cases in the table below):

Continuity and differentiability assumption | Sign of the derivative on immediate left of | Sign of on immediate right of | Conclusion about local minimum, local maximum, or neither |
---|---|---|---|

is continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of | positive | negative | strict local maximum |

is continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of | negative | positive | strict local minimum |

is continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of | positive | positive | neither local maximum nor local minimum, because is increasing through the point |

is continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of | negative | negative | neither local maximum nor local minimum, because is decreasing through the point |

If we replace *positive* by *nonnegative* and *negative* by *nonpositive* in the rows corresponding to strict local maximum and strict local minimum, we could potentially lose the *strictness*.

Note that if has ambiguous sign on the immediate left or on the immediate right of , the first derivative test is inconclusive.

### Relation with critical points

The typical goal of the first derivative test is to determine whether a critical point is a point of local maximum or minimum. Hence, the test is typically applied to critical points. *However, when applying the first derivative test, we do not need to check whether the point in question is a critical point. In other words, if the condition for being a point of local maximum or minimum is satisfied, then the point in question is automatically a critical point and this condition need not be checked separately.*

### Succinct version

Here is a shorter version: at a critical point, if the derivative changes sign from positive to negative (as we go from left to right) then it is a point of local maximum. If the derivative changes sign from negative to positive (as we go from left to right) then that is a point of local minimum.

## Facts used

- Positive derivative implies increasing
- Increasing on open interval and continuous at endpoint implies increasing up to and including endpoint

## Proof

### Example proof of one-sided version: positive derivative on left

All the one-sided versions have analogous proofs, so we provide a proof only for one of them.

**Given**: A function and a point in the domain. is left continuous *at* and differentiable on the immediate left of . Further, on the immediate left of . Explicitly, there exists such that for .

**To prove**: has a strict local maximum from the left at . More explicitly, we have for .

**Proof**:

Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | is increasing on the immediate left of , i.e., is increasing on the interval . | Fact (1) | for | given-fact direct | |

2 | is increasing from the left up to and including , i.e., is increasing on . | Fact (2) | is left continuous at | Step (1) | step-given-fact direct |

3 | for | Step (2) | Follows directly from Step (2). |

### Example proof of combined sign version: strict local maximum

We give the proof for the strict local maximum case. Other cases are analogous.

**Given**: A function and a point in the domain. is continuous *at* and differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of . Further, on the immediate left of and on the immediate right of .

**To prove**: has a two-sided strict local maximum at , i.e., for on the immediate left or the immediate right of .

**Proof**:

Step no. | Assertion/construction | Facts used | Given data used | Previous steps used | Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | has a strict local maximum from the left at | one-sided version for strict local max from the left | is continuous at and on the immediate left of | Since is continuous at , it is in particular left continuous at . Combining this with (on the immediate left) and the one-sided sign version of the first derivative test, we obtain the result.
| |

2 | has a strict local maximum from the right at | one-sided version for strict local max from the right | is continuous at and on the immediate right of | Since is continuous at , it is in particular right continuous at . Combining this with (on the right of ) and the one-sided sign version of the first derivative test, we obtain the result.
| |

3 | has a two-sided strict local maximum at | Steps (1), (2) | Step-combination direct |

## Related tests

## Strength of the test

### First derivative test does not require differentiability at the point

To apply the two-sided combined sign version of the first derivative test, we need *continuity* at the point and differentiability on the immediate left and immediate right of the point. However, we do not require differentiability *at* the point.

Thus, for instance, the first derivative test can be used to study the behavior of a function with a piecewise definition by interval, such that the function is changing definition at the point. Explicitly, it can be used to study functions of the form:

Assume that is continuous at , i.e., . In that case, we can try to determine whether is a point of local maximum, minimum, or neither by studying the sign of to the immediate left of and the sign of to the immediate right of . It is not necessary that be differentiable at (for more on how to differentiate piecewise functions, see differentiation rule for piecewise definition by interval).

In particular, we *may* be able to apply the first derivative test in these two types of situations:

Case | Examples where the first derivative test works |
---|---|

has one-sided derivatives at , but these are not equal to each other | and (get local minimum) , (get neither, as the function increases through the point) |

does not have well defined one-sided derivatives at , but the derivative is defined on the immediate left and immediate right | , (get local minimum) , (get neither, as the function increases through the point) |

### Relation between first derivative test and second derivative test

`For further information, refer: First derivative test is stronger than second derivative test`

The first derivative test is *strictly more powerful* than the second derivative test. In other words, in any situation where the second derivative test is applicable and conclusive, the first derivative test is also applicable and conclusive. However, there are many situations where the first derivative test is conclusive but the second derivative test is not.

### Relation between first derivative test and direct analysis of one-sided derivatives

The first derivative test is neither strictly stronger nor strictly weaker than a direct analysis of one-sided derivatives. By *direct analysis of one-sided derivatives* we mean using the sign of the left hand derivative and right hand derivative at the point to determine whether we have a strict local maximum or strict local minimum at the point. Note that the analysis of one-sided derivatives is inconclusive whenever the one-sided derivative is zero or undefined. We have:

Example function | Conclusion | Is the first derivative test conclusive? | Is direct analysis of one-sided derivatives conclusive? | |
---|---|---|---|---|

, | local minimum | Yes | No, because both one-sided derivatives are zero | |

, | local minimum | Yes | Yes | |

, | local minimum | No | Yes | |

, | local minimum | No | No |

## When is the test conclusive and inconclusive?

### Situations when the test is inconclusive

Note that we consider the first derivative test to be conclusive if we can definitely conclude whether we have a local maximum, local minimum, or neither. In particular, the first derivative test is conclusive for a function that's continuous at the point, differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of the point, and whose derivative takes constant sign (possibly allowing zero values) on the immediate left and constant sign (possibly allowing zero values) on the immediate right.

The following problems could occur when applying this test:

What problem do we run into? | What kind of trouble can we have? | Link to example | Can this be fixed? | Picture |
---|---|---|---|---|

The function is not continuous at the critical point | We may be able to do sign analysis of the derivative on the immediate left and immediate right, but draw incorrect conclusions by applying the one-sided or combined sign version of the first derivative test. A priori, all the possibilities (local maximum, local minimum, neither) remain open. | first derivative test fails for function that is discontinuous at the critical point | If the function has one-sided limits at the critical point: variation of first derivative test for discontinuous function with one-sided limits | |

The function is not differentiable at points on the immediate left and/or immediate right of the point | We will not be able to make a meaningful statement about the sign of the derivative on the immediate left and/or immediate right. Thus, it will not be possible to apply the first derivative test. All the possibilities (local maximum, local minimum, neither) remain open. | -- | Not directly. We have to use other methods. | |

The derivative of the function has oscillatory (ambiguous) sign on the immediate left and/or immediate right of the point | We cannot do sign analysis on the derivative on the immediate left and/or immediate right. Thus, it will not be possible to apply the first derivative test. All the possibilities (local maximum, local minimum, neither) remain open. | First derivative test is inconclusive for function whose derivative has ambiguous sign around the point |

### Condition for the test to be conclusive

- First derivative test is conclusive for differentiable function at isolated critical point: If is continuous at and differentiable on the immediate left and immediate right of a critical point ,
*and*is an isolated critical point (i.e., there is an open interval containing it that contains no other critical points), then the first derivative test must be conclusive at . In other words, we can use the first derivative test to definitively determine whether is a point of local maximum, local minimum, or neither, for . - In particular, the first derivative test is always conclusive for polynomials and rational functions. It is also conclusive for functions with piecewise definition by interval where each of the piece is a polynomial or rational function.