Substitution method for power series summation: Difference between revisions

From Calculus
Line 102: Line 102:
<math>\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{x^k}{(2k)!} = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl} \cosh \sqrt{x}, & x \ge 0 \\ \cos \sqrt{-x}, & x < 0 \\\end{array}\right.</math>
<math>\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{x^k}{(2k)!} = \left\lbrace \begin{array}{rl} \cosh \sqrt{x}, & x \ge 0 \\ \cos \sqrt{-x}, & x < 0 \\\end{array}\right.</math>


==Interaction with interval of convergence==
==Interval of validity of power series summation==


If the power series after the <math>u</math>-substitution <math>u = \lambda x^m</math> has a radius of convergence <math>R</math> for <math>u</math>, the original power series has a radius of convergence <math>(R/|\lambda|)^{1/m}</math>.
===Transforming the interval of validity along with the substitution===


For inclusion of endpoints, we need to be more careful. Essentially, we need to figure out how the substitution <math>u = \lambda x^m</math> behaves on <math>x = \pm (R/|\lambda|)^{1/m}</math>.
Consider the <math>u</math>-substitution <math>u = \lambda x^m</math>, giving:
 
<math>\sum a_k\lambda^kx^{mk} \to \sum a_ku^k</math>
 
We use some formula to sum up the power series rewritten in terms of <math>u</math>. In the typical scenario, the formula we use is valid over the entire [[interval of convergence]] of <math>u</math>, though we may sometimes have a situation where the formula we've obtained is valid only on part of the interval. We then plug back <math>u = x^{mk}</math> and get a formula for the summation in terms of <math>x</math>.
 
The final formula is valid ''precisely'' for those <math>x</math> for which <math>x^{mk}</math> is in the set of values of <math>u</math> for which the formula in terms of <math>u</math> is valid.
 
In the good case that the formula is valid over the entire interval of convergence for the power series in <math>u</math>, we have:
 
* If the radius of convergence for the power series in <math>u</math> is <math>R</math>, the radius of convergence of the power series in <math>x</math> is <math>(R/|\lambda|)^{1/m}</math>.
* To determine whether the endpoints are included, apply the map <math>x \mapsto \lambda x^m</math> to the values <math>x = \pm (R/|\lambda|)^{1/m}</math> and check whether the image of the map is in the interval of convergence for <math>u</math>.
 
===Multiplication and division===
 
If the substitution method is combined with multiplying/dividing by a power of <math>x</math>, then we also need to worry about the case <math>x = 0</math>. In this case, the power series may still converge, but the formal expression we obtained may not be valid, though its limit would still be the right value.

Revision as of 22:28, 6 July 2012

Description of the method

The substitution method for power series summation is a method that can be used to convert one power series summation problem into another one. It is typically done with the goal of making the summation easier to obtain an explicit closed-form expression for.

Scalar multiple substitution

This is a substitution of the form u=λx for λ a constant. Explicitly, consider a power series of the form:

k=k0akλkxk

(Note that the starting point k0 could be 0, 1, or anything).

Then, with the substitution u=λx, this becomes:

k=k0akuk

We can use scalar multiple substitutions in order to get rid of purely exponential parts of the coefficients.

Power substitution

This is a substitution of the form u=xm for m a constant. Explicitly, consider a power series of the form:

k=k0akxmk

(Note that the starting point k0 could be 0, 1, or anything).

Then, with the subtsitution u=xm, this becomes:

k=k0akuk

Scalar multiple of power substitution

This combines the previous two substitution ideas, with a substitution of the form u=λxm for λ,m constants. Explicitly, consider a power series of the form:

k=k0akλkxmk

(Note that the starting point k0 could be 0, 1, or anything).

Then, with the subtsitution u=λxm, this becomes:

k=k0akuk

Application

Goal of the substitution

The substitution method is typically used for two purposes:

  • Get rid of unnecessary multiplicative exponential terms in the coefficients (the scalar multiple part takes care of this)
  • Try to scale the exponent so that it better matches the coefficients (the power part takes care of this): The general rule is that, at the end of the substitution, the exponent should match, as closely as possible, any term that is in a denominator or whose factorial is in the denominator.

Combination with multiplication

Substitution can be combined with another common technique for power series manipulation: multiply and divide by x in order to make the exponent better match the coefficient.

Examples

Simple examples

Power series in x u-substitution Scalar multiple or power or both? New power series in u Sum in term of u Sum in terms of x (need to substitute back)
k=0x3kk! u=x3 power k=0ukk! eu ex3
k=1x5kk u=x5 power k=1ukk ln(1u) ln(1x5) (note that the interval of convergence is not all of R, but rather is [1,1) -- however, that is not the focus here)
k=02kxkk! u=2x scalar multiple k=0ukk! eu e2x
k=032kx3kk! u=9x3 combined k=0ukk! eu e9x3
k=0x14k(2k)! u=x7 (we want the exponent on it to match the expression under the factorial) power k=0u2k(2k)! coshu cosh(x7)

Examples that involve some combination of substitution and multiplying/dividing

Power series in x manipulation + u-substitution Scalar multiple or power or both? New power series in u Sum in term of u Sum in terms of x (need to substitute back)
k=0x3k+1k! first pull out a factor of x, then do u=x3 power xk=0ukk! xeu xex3
k=0x14k+2(2k+1)! first multiply/divide by x5 (to make the exponent 7(2k+1)), then do u=x7 power 1x5k=0u2k+1(2k+1)! sinhux5 sinh(x7)x5 (Note: The expression is not valid at x=0 though its limit equals the power series sum at 0; both the limit and the power series sum at 0 are equal to 0)

Example involving a fractional power substitution

Consider the power series summation problem:

k=0xk(2k)!

We want to do a u-substitution that makes the exponent 2k so as to match the denominator. In order to do this, we would need to put u=x1/2. This, however, is problematic since we don't know the sign of x. Thus, we make cases:

Case on sign of x u-substitution Power series in terms of u Sum in terms of u Sum in terms of x
positive u=x, so x=u2 k=0u2k(2k)! coshu coshx
negative u=x, so x=u2 k=0(1)ku2k(2k)! cosu cosx

At x=0, either description fits. Overall, we have a piecewise definition of function for the sum of the series:

k=0xk(2k)!={coshx,x0cosx,x<0

Interval of validity of power series summation

Transforming the interval of validity along with the substitution

Consider the u-substitution u=λxm, giving:

akλkxmkakuk

We use some formula to sum up the power series rewritten in terms of u. In the typical scenario, the formula we use is valid over the entire interval of convergence of u, though we may sometimes have a situation where the formula we've obtained is valid only on part of the interval. We then plug back u=xmk and get a formula for the summation in terms of x.

The final formula is valid precisely for those x for which xmk is in the set of values of u for which the formula in terms of u is valid.

In the good case that the formula is valid over the entire interval of convergence for the power series in u, we have:

  • If the radius of convergence for the power series in u is R, the radius of convergence of the power series in x is (R/|λ|)1/m.
  • To determine whether the endpoints are included, apply the map xλxm to the values x=±(R/|λ|)1/m and check whether the image of the map is in the interval of convergence for u.

Multiplication and division

If the substitution method is combined with multiplying/dividing by a power of x, then we also need to worry about the case x=0. In this case, the power series may still converge, but the formal expression we obtained may not be valid, though its limit would still be the right value.