Quiz:Limit and continuity: Difference between revisions

From Calculus
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|type="()"}
|type="()"}
- For every <math>\alpha > 0</math>, there exists <math>\beta > 0</math> such that if <math>0 < |x - c| < \alpha</math>, then <math>|f(x) - L| < \beta</math>.
- For every <math>\alpha > 0</math>, there exists <math>\beta > 0</math> such that if <math>0 < |x - c| < \alpha</math>, then <math>|f(x) - L| < \beta</math>.
- There exists <math>\alpha > 0$ such that for every <math>\beta > 0</math>, and <math>0 < |x - c| < \alpha</math>, we have <math>|f(x) - L| < \beta</math>.
- There exists <math>\alpha > 0</math> such that for every <math>\beta > 0</math>, and <math>0 < |x - c| < \alpha</math>, we have <math>|f(x) - L| < \beta</math>.
+ For every <math>\alpha > 0</math>, there exists <math>\beta > 0</math> such that if <math>0 < |x - c| < \beta</math>, then <math>|f(x) - L| < \alpha</math>.
+ For every <math>\alpha > 0</math>, there exists <math>\beta > 0</math> such that if <math>0 < |x - c| < \beta</math>, then <math>|f(x) - L| < \alpha</math>.
- There exists <math>\alpha > 0</math> such that for every <math>\beta > 0</math> and <math>0 < |x - c| < \beta</math>, we have <math>|f(x) - L| < \alpha</math>.
- There exists <math>\alpha > 0</math> such that for every <math>\beta > 0</math> and <math>0 < |x - c| < \beta</math>, we have <math>|f(x) - L| < \alpha</math>.
Line 26: Line 26:
- Every larger value of <math>\delta</math> works for the same <math>\epsilon</math>. Also, the given value of <math>\delta</math> works for every larger value of <math>\epsilon</math>.
- Every larger value of <math>\delta</math> works for the same <math>\epsilon</math>. Also, the given value of <math>\delta</math> works for every larger value of <math>\epsilon</math>.
- None of the above statements need always be true.
- None of the above statements need always be true.
{Which of the following is a correct formulation of the statement <math>\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = L</math>, in a manner that avoids the use of <math>\epsilon</math>s and <math>\delta</math>s?
|type="()"}
- For every open interval centered at <math>c</math>, there is an open interval centered at <math>L</math> such that the image under <math>f</math> of the open interval centered at <math>c</math> (excluding the point <math>c</math> itself) is contained in the open interval centered at <math>L</math>.
- For every open interval centered at <math>c</math>, there is an open interval centered at <math>L</math> such that the image under <math>f</math> of the open interval centered at <math>c</math> (excluding the point <math>c</math> itself) contains the open interval centered at <math>L</math>.
+ For every open interval centered at <math>L</math>, there is an open interval centered at <math>c</math> such that the image under <math>f</math> of the open interval centered at <math>c</math> (excluding the point <math>c</math> itself) is contained in the open interval centered at <math>L</math>.
- For every open interval centered at <math>L</math>, there is an open interval centered at <math>c</math> such that the image under <math>f</math> of the open interval centered at <math>c</math> (excluding the point <math>c</math> itself) contains the open interval centered at <math>L</math>.
- None of the above.


</quiz>
</quiz>

Latest revision as of 23:11, 20 October 2011

Formal definition of limit and continuity

1 Which of these is the correct interpretation of in terms of the definition of limit?

For every , there exists such that if , then .
There exists such that for every , and , we have .
For every , there exists such that if , then .
There exists such that for every and , we have .
None of the above

2 Suppose is a function. Which of the following says that does not have a limit at any point in (i.e., there is no point for which exists)?

For every , there exists such that for every , there exists such that for all satisfying , we have <math>|f(x) - L| \ge
There exists such that for every , there exists such that for every , there exists satisfying and .
For every and every , there exists such that for every , there exists satisfying and .
There exists and such that for every , there exists such that for all satisfying , we have .
All of the above.

3 In the usual definition of limit for a given limit , if a given value works for a given value , then which of the following is true?

Every smaller positive value of works for the same . Also, the given value of works for every smaller positive value of .
Every smaller positive value of works for the same . Also, the given value of works for every larger value of .
Every larger value of works for the same . Also, the given value of works for every smaller positive value of .
Every larger value of works for the same . Also, the given value of works for every larger value of .
None of the above statements need always be true.

4 Which of the following is a correct formulation of the statement , in a manner that avoids the use of s and s?

For every open interval centered at , there is an open interval centered at such that the image under of the open interval centered at (excluding the point itself) is contained in the open interval centered at .
For every open interval centered at , there is an open interval centered at such that the image under of the open interval centered at (excluding the point itself) contains the open interval centered at .
For every open interval centered at , there is an open interval centered at such that the image under of the open interval centered at (excluding the point itself) is contained in the open interval centered at .
For every open interval centered at , there is an open interval centered at such that the image under of the open interval centered at (excluding the point itself) contains the open interval centered at .
None of the above.