Alternating series theorem: Difference between revisions

From Calculus
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
* [[Alternating series theorem fails if signs are not strictly alternating]]: If we replace the strict alternation condition on signs by simply saying that the sign switches between positive and negative infinitely often, that is ''not'' sufficient to guarantee convergence of the alternating series. Note that it may still ''happen'' that the series converges, but there is no guarantee by the theorem.
* [[Alternating series theorem fails if signs are not strictly alternating]]: If we replace the strict alternation condition on signs by simply saying that the sign switches between positive and negative infinitely often, that is ''not'' sufficient to guarantee convergence of the alternating series. Note that it may still ''happen'' that the series converges, but there is no guarantee by the theorem.
* [[Alternating series theorem fails if terms are not monotonically decreasing in magnitude]]: If we drop the condition that the magnitude of the terms is monotonically decreasing, then the series need not converge. Note that it may still ''happen'' to converge, but there is no guarantee by the theorem.
* [[Alternating series theorem fails if terms are not monotonically decreasing in magnitude]]: If we drop the condition that the magnitude of the terms is monotonically decreasing, then the series need not converge. Note that it may still ''happen'' to converge, but there is no guarantee by the theorem.
* [[Analogoue of alternating series theorem if magnitude of terms approaches a positive number]]: The alternating series theorem fails if the magnitude of terms does not approach zero. However, we can formulate an analogous theorem which says that the difference between the limit superior and limit inferior of the partial sums is precisely that positive number limit.
* [[Analogue of alternating series theorem if magnitude of terms approaches a positive number]]: The alternating series theorem fails if the magnitude of terms does not approach zero. However, we can formulate an analogous theorem which says that the difference between the limit superior and limit inferior of the partial sums is precisely that positive number limit.

Revision as of 16:03, 3 July 2012

This article describes a test that is used to determine, in some cases, whether a given infinite series or improper integral converges. It may help determine whether we have absolute convergence, conditional convergence, or neither.
View a complete list of convergence tests

Statement

Basic statement

Consider a series of the form:

Suppose the following three conditions hold for the series:

  1. Alternating signs: All the s are nonzero and the sign of is opposite the sign of .
  2. Monotonically decreasing in magnitude: for all .
  3. Terms approach zero: .

Then the series is a convergent series. It may be an absolutely convergent series or a conditionally convergent series, depending on whether the series of the absolute values of its terms converges.

Eventually variation

The alternating series theorem can be generalized as follows: we do not require that the series be alternating or monotonically decreasing in magnitude right from the outset. Rather, we do require that the series eventually be alternating and eventually the terms be monotonically decreasing in magnitude.

Related facts

Significance of each condition